Lords of Xulima Review (PC)

Party like it’s 1991


DISCLAIMER: I never finished Lords of Xulima. There’s simply too much game here, and I didn’t have enough time. There is supposedly 150+ hours of content, and if the approximately 25 hours I played are any indication, the entire game is worth seeing.



When designing Lords of Xulima, it’s almost certain that developer Numantian Games asked themselves one question: “What would classic cRPGs do?” Following in the steps of Legend of Grimrock and the more recent Divinity: Original Sin, Lords of Xulima feels right at home with the likes of Might and Magic and Ultima.

Upon starting up Xulima, I was given one mandatory main character, Gaulen, and made to create five more from scratch. There are a handful of classes, deity alignments, and the rest of the regular cRPG trappings, along with some frankly hysterical character portraits. My Bard looked like a cartoon David Hasselhoff aged thirty years, so I named him Hasselhoff (at least, he looked like Hasselhoff at the time; I’m beginning to suspect I was inebriated). One nice thing is that after selecting my class and alignment, I was given a choice between two starting weapons for that class — for Wizards it’s short swords or staves, for Rogues it’s daggers or bows, etc. Where most games would have given me one of the two weapons and expected me to find the other later, or — in the less common, but arguably lazier case — given me none of them and conveniently placed a chest or satchel a short distance into the first area (a la Baldur’s Gate II).


Don’t dare tell me it doesn’t look like Hasselhoff. I realize this now.

After creating my party, I was presented with a cinematic in which a god named Golot instructs Gaulen to restore balance to Xulima, where four apparently evil princes have all but enslaved the denizens, essentially claiming themselves tyrants. Golot’s monologue is rather cryptic and  confusing, with talk of Soul Guardians gaining power over the Lords of Xulima, and some exposition that honestly reminded me of the first few minutes of Kingdom Hearts, and — now that I think about it — all of Kingdom Hearts II. The story (for me at least) takes a back seat to what makes these kinds of games so incredible: the exploration. I’m sure it’s a worthwhile and interesting narrative, but it presents with a sense of generic ambivalence seemingly pervasive in this genre of games.


Xulima is a fantastically big place, and I never came close to seeing it all. I ultimately spent the bulk of my time exploring and doing side quests; I didn’t even finish the main story (in retrospect, perhaps I should work on my time management). It’s unfortunate that Lords of Xulima attempted to funnel me into doing the main quest — which it only half-succeeded at, by the way — by placing incredibly difficult encounters at key points, barring my access until I’d finished the story quests for those areas; I really enjoyed the exploration and combat, and I would have liked to be able to have less linearity. It’s doubly unfortunate that the game is billed as decidedly non-linear, when from my time with it, that is absolutely not the case — it does open up after a certain point, but it’s sort of like calling Final Fantasy XIII non-linear because after twenty hours you’re able to explore a small part of Gran Pulse. At any rate, exploring is tense and uncertain, with the presence of a food meter that slowly ticked down as I walked around. A counter near the bottom of the interface shows how much food is left, but buying or looting food was the only way I could find to increase my supplies. In addition, different types of terrain affect both movement speed and food consumption; moving through snow, for instance, doubles food consumption and halves walking speed. The latter seems entirely unnecessary, given that food consumption increases, and the fact that I already thought movement was incredibly slow on regular terrain like grass or stone paths. Ultimately, I found the food mechanic to be totally superfluous and just another method of tethering me to within acceptable range of where Lords of Xulima wanted me to go.


Combat in Lords of Xulima is nothing spectacular or unique, but it is well-designed, and it is challenging — Xulima as a whole is very punishing. It’s similar in presentation to Might and Magic games of yore, but more akin to Legend of Grimrock in mechanical execution. Characters wielding melee weapons can only attack enemies within their immediate forward field of view, and characters in the back row can only attack the front row if they are equipped with a spear or a ranged weapon. It’s a somewhat tired formula, but it’s effective and simple to understand. If a character happens to die in combat, resting can resurrect them. I’m not really sure how that’s supposed to work — at one point, my bard died, so I just slept for a day and Hasselhoff was with me again. Also, the combat animations are deeply unsettling; the game runs at 60 frames per second, but the animations look like they’re straight out of the Nintendo 64.

Ultimately, Lords of Xulima leans perhaps too hard into emulating classic cRPGs. Most of it is well-designed, but at a $20 price point, it’s obviously going to lack the polish of a game like Divinity: Original Sin. It’s not an unenjoyable game by any stretch; it is, however, an incredible niche experience. For real, though: You need to see the combat animations. They look like a dungeon master made the animatronics at Chuck-E-Cheese.


Final Verdict: 3/5


Available on: PC (reviewed) ; Publisher: Numantian Games; Developer: Numantian Games; Players: 1; Released: November 14, 2014; ESRB: T for Teen ; MSRP: $19.99

This review is based on a review copy of Lords of Xulima provided by the publisher.


Adam has a penchant for strong, minority opinions, and loves Mass Effect, JRPGs, and the Warriors games -- sometimes perhaps a bit too much. He will defend Final Fantasy XIII to his grave, and honestly believes people give Dragon Age II too much flak.
  • gigigifero

    did you passed the tutorial, retard?

    • Adam Foster

      I did! If you read, I played about 25 hours of it! A 3 is a good score. Have a great day!

      • Yet your Steam profile shows you’ve only played the game for 13 hours. How can you have journalistic integrity by making blatant exaggerations like this?

        Honestly, a lot of bad stuff has come out of the whole #GamerGate situation, but at this point I think it’s going to go a long way in raising standards in the video game industry. “Atrocious, but necessary.” -Anders Breivik

        • PlusSizedGamer93

          This makes no sense and I have no idea why you brought Anders Breivik up. No time for you simple minded people when there is gaming afoot I always say.

          • Jay Petrequin

            Adam’s telling the truth. Steam does not record offline play time. If you actually had any sense or decency you would have at least taken the effort to verify that, instead of sitting here slinging wrongful accusations at one of our best reviewers.

        • Adam Foster

          My internet was down for a good deal of my playtime, as is wont to do during bad weather. Thanks for being a weirdo and creeping on my steam profile, I guess.

          • Adam Foster

            Also it’s cool that literally any discrepancy anywhere means that referencing mass murderers and horrible assholes is warranted. Fuck off with that GamerGate bullshit. We don’t want it here.

          • Steam still records offline play-time. You’re lying.

        • Jay Petrequin

          The fact that you are so determined to prove one of our reviewers’ work as inadequate that you would be driven to seek out their steam profile says a lot about your own values on “journalistic integrity.” What I mean by that is that you were clearly determined to prove that Adam has none. To echo Adam’s sentiment, we don’t want any GamerGate ideologies here. We invite you to see yourself out, to go find a new website to waste your life getting angry at when they say a game is less than immaculate.

  • PlusSizedGamer93

    What the Heck! I wanted to buy this game but seeing this review has changed my mind Thanks Adam!

Join Our Discord!

Join Our Discord!

Click the icon above to join our Discord! Ask a Mod or staff member to make you a member to see all the channels.

Review Archives

  • 2018 (6)
  • 2017 (434)
  • 2016 (427)
  • 2015 (172)
  • 2014 (91)
  • 2013 (29)
  • 2012 (11)
  • 2011 (9)
  • 2010 (12)